Friday, July 31, 2009
Making Silence
LAST WEEK, I WROTE about Agatho’s Stone and the “learning” of silence. This week, I’ve had some discussions about silence with a few friends who read about Agatho that offer thoughts worth sharing. My good friend Jean, in Virginia Beach, said “I’m not a talker; living alone, I have plenty of silence. Still, I try to listen for that ‘small voice,’ for God and His plans…” and Alan, my atheistic pal from Santa Barbara (how can you be an atheist and live in the hills over Santa Barbara?) wrote: “I wish more Christians would be quiet. What they have to say is often poorly thought-out. Mostly it’s just stupid or insulting. Can’t you get all of them to use those rocks?” Paul, a young man I prepared for Confirmation long ago who’s now not quite so young and is considerably more thoughtful, has written me a couple of notes this week. He says, “We aren’t monks who’ve made vows to keep silence. How can we be silent and be part of society? I could understand how this could help in a Trappist monastery but I find it hard to see the usefulness of silence to me.” Jean spends a lot of time in silence just because of her living situation; Alan wants people to keep their half-baked religious notions to themselves; and Paul sees the potential value of silence but finds it difficult, if not impossible, to see a place for it in our daily lives. Our situations are all different, but the need each of us has for silence is the same. Remember why Agatho put the stone in his mouth. It was to “learn” silence. Agatho lived in the desert. He didn’t have much of a chance to talk to anybody in the first place. His point was not “I don’t want to talk” or “Here in the desert there’s nobody to talk to anyway.” It wasn’t even that Agatho thought he didn’t have anything to say worth hearing. He was cultivating silence, cherishing it, growing it.
Paul is right. Most of us don’t live in Trappist monasteries. We can’t refuse to answer questions our boss asks because we’re cultivating silence. But we can learn the profound lessons Agatho himself learned by forming an intention of silence. We can choose to be silent at certain times. We can go for walks or retire to the woods by ourselves or sit on the beach. We can retreat for a few days to a quiet place—a monastery or vacation spot. We need silence. Today everyone is supposed to “be themselves” and “express their feelings,” but Alan the atheist is right: most of the ideas that pass for religion or spirituality that come out of the mouths of those “being themselves” are insipid and trite. A mantra I’ve heard times innumerable in southern California is “I’m not religious, but I’m a very spiritual person.” The sentences which follow this statement invariably show the speaker knows nothing of either religion or spirituality. True religion and genuine spirituality have several components but one most necessary to both is silence. We don’t learn silence by just shutting up. We have to search it out. We learn silence by being silent. We don’t have to do it with the desert fierceness of Agatho, that calling comes to few of us. But whether it’s putting up a fence on a south Texas ranch or turning off the computer and going for a walk every other day, the person who seeks to walk the Labyrinth knows there are some steps that have to be made in complete silence. We must learn to be alone, we must cultivate silence, to have things of value to say. In that pregnant silence, we will hear the Voice that’s been waiting to speak.
FROM MY BOOKSTACK this week, I pulled an old book I’ve been meaning to re-read for years. It’s been there for more than a year, its position in the stack moved up and down in relation to others for reasons sometimes unexamined. Now, having read it again, I know what those reasons are. The book is The Conscience of a Conservative, written by the late Senator Barry Goldwater, with help from his friend L Brent Bozell, Jr., William F Buckley’s best friend and brother-in-law. The book is neither subtle in its message nor complex in its argument and is only about 125 pages. So why did it sit, unread, in my stack of books for the last 14 months? Simple and straightforward, the book is distressing. You can read the whole of it in an evening, but if you pick it up, it’s unlikely you will. You’ll be stopping too often to think about what Goldwater said 45 years ago, and how insightful his words are today. The longest chapter in the book “The Soviet Menace,” might seem irrelevant now, but its insights remain valid: “What about the Russian people? We are repeatedly told that the Russian man-on-the-street is woefully ignorant of the American way…is it relevant? As long as the Russian people do not control their government, it makes little difference if they think well of us or ill. It is high time that our leaders stopped treating the Russian people and the Soviet government as one and the same thing.” What would happen if those principles were applied in 2009 to Iran? At its heart the book reminds us that the basic principles on which our country was founded were radical then and they remain so today. They call us to practice freedom. Goldwater warns that the tendency of human beings over the centuries has been to surrender freedom for something else. He pointedly quotes the famous words of Franklin and gives them a startling conclusion: “ ‘What have you given us?’ a woman asked Ben Franklin towards the close of the Constitutional Convention. ‘A Republic’ he said, 'if you can keep it…’ We have not kept it,” Goldwater concludes. In ten chapters the short book reviews some of the areas that most concerned its author, detailing simply but effectively the practical consequences of government programs on the country. But most important, The Conscience of a Conservative reminds us that, regardless of the promises of politicians to justify their reelections by promising us more and more, we lose far more than we receive. In the end, that’s what makes this book important: it recalls its readers to a genuine and ancient hope. The state and, let me add, most of our society, sees men and women in economic and political terms. Those things are useful, but not the end-all of existence. “Conservatism,” Goldwater says at the beginning of his book, “looks upon the enhancement of man’s spiritual nature as the primary concern of political philosophy.” As I read I couldn’t help but reflect that we have not only failed to advance that principle in the years since it was first written, but have receded far from it. Freedom isn’t something we’re given by the state or society. We have it from our Creator. But we must each of us make it our own. With unsubtle books like this, we can regain that vision it’s so easy to lose.
QUOTES OF THE PRINCIPALS:
“We should always be disposed to believe that that which appears white is really black, if the hierarchy of the Church so decides.”—St Ignatius Loyola
"Few souls understand what God would accomplish in them if they were to abandon themselves unreservedly to Him and if they were to allow His grace to mold them accordingly."—St Ignatius Loyola
“Wherever God erects a house of prayer, The Devil always builds a chapel there; And 'twill be found, upon examination, The latter has the largest congregation.”—Daniel Defoe
“Nature has left this tincture in the blood: all men would be tyrants if they could.”—Daniel Defoe
“Slavery exists. It is black in the South, and white in the North.”—President Andrew Johnson
“It's a damn poor mind that can only think of one way to spell a word.”—President Andrew Johnson
AND FINALLY, remembering Black Tot Day, one more from Daniel Defoe:
“Any Englishman will fairly drink as much as will maintain two whole families of the Dutch.”
Friday, July 24, 2009
Agatho's Stone
THE STORY IS TOLD THAT AGATHO, an Egyptian monk who lived in the desert 1600 years ago, carried a stone in his mouth for three years, “until he learned silence.” This immediately calls to mind Demosthenes, the Greek orator who stuffed his mouth with stones, but for the opposite reason: he was trying to perfect his enunciation. The stone taught Agatho silence; it trained Demosthenes how to speak. While it’s hard to imagine anyone today putting a rock in their mouth (remember Audrey Hepburn as Eliza in My Fair Lady; when Professor Higgins, following Demosthenes, plopped some pebbles in Eliza’s mouth, she swallowed them!), we can at least understand Demosthenes’ motivation: he wanted to be a better public speaker. But what did Agatho have in mind? He wanted to be silent—and not just now and then—but, as the ancient monastic text says of him, he wanted to “learn” silence. He was cultivating it. For Agatho, silence had some special meaning and importance. Mark Twain joked about one aspect of silence: “It is better to keep your mouth closed and let people think you are a fool than to open it and remove all doubt.” So saying, he was expressing an idea that stretched back to the ancient world, even before Agatho. Cato the Elder, that stern as nails old Roman, said: “The first virtue is to restrain the tongue; he approaches nearest to gods who knows how to be silent, even though he is in the right.” From Cato to Dale Carnegie, it’s been good for business to know “the customer is always right” and keep quiet when necessary. Agatho’s rock, though, points to a different lesson. His rock didn’t just keep him from talking, it taught him silence.
Years and years ago, I knew a woman who couldn’t endure silence. If there were people in the room and no one was talking, she would fidget and squirm and start sputtering “ums” and “wells” until some inane sentence would form and she would release it. Silence scared her. Agatho understood that silence had value. When I’m not speaking, I can listen. I can listen to others (that may be scary), I can listen to myself (that may be scarier) and, if I practice, I can even listen to God (that is the scariest of all). But all three of these “listenings” take practice and require that we “learn silence.”
Walking your labyrinth is meant to be a sort of Agatho’s stone. One of the basic lessons of the labyrinth is that you walk it yourself. Companions on the Way are gifts, and Scripture speaks true when it records “It is not good for man to be alone.” But at the most basic level, we are. All “Oprah-like” wisdom to the contrary, we are finite. God made us with limits and boundaries we cannot cross. Part of growing—growing up, growing old, growing in grace—is coming to terms with our limits, and learning to be thankful for and rejoice in them. Yes, we need to “never give up, never!” as Churchill insisted. Knowing our limits doesn’t mean we don’t try to push them, to continue to grow. Wisdom, though, is realizing we can’t be everything. God set your feet on the labyrinth of your life and told you to find your way home. To do that, you have to pay attention. We must learn to listen, to develop “ears that can hear.” When we’ve learned the silence that enables us to listen to others, we’ll find out we’re beginning to learn the silence that allows us to listen to ourselves. The third silence enables us to begin to hear the rare and purposeful whisperings of the “still, small voice” meant for us and for our salvation. It’s a Voice that leads us Home; a Voice that’s been beckoning us, we will someday come to understand, all along. We haven’t been able to hear it much because we’ve been doing all the talking. When Agatho realized it, he put a rock in his mouth. Maybe you can find a small pebble and see what happens.
OF YOUR CHARITY, please remember Robert Williams, my great and good friend, who died Thursday, July 23rd. Requiem aeternam dona ei, Domine et lux perpetua luceat ei.
FROM MY BOOKSTACK this week, thanks to Melissa Berry (through whom I’m reliving some of my old days in academe), I have rediscovered a book I would almost certainly not have picked up again. While studying at the University lo, those decades ago, I started to read John Ruskin’s The Stones of Venice. Started, but never finished; never came close. When Melissa asked me about it recently (they’re reading it in her post-graduate class), I went and found me a copy. Mine, published by Little, Brown & Company in 1981, is beautifully illustrated with photographs, some by Ruskin, and many sketches and watercolors, all by Ruskin. But it is the text you fall into. Here and there, like the waters of Venice, his technical notes go over the head of an aficionado of architecture ancient and modern. But Ruskin’s descriptions and more especially his commentaries, based on architectural biases as immutable as the laws of the Medes and the Persians, are bold and thoughtful. He may not be right in all his judgments on Byzantine, Gothic and Renaissance art and architecture, but he knows what he likes, what he thinks is good and uplifting, and he knows what is crass and debased. He gathered his materials for the book during a three-year stay in Venice from 1849-1852, and published it in England in 1853. During those three years, Ruskin documented Venice as he found it, using a camera, sketch book and watercolors. He climbed ladders up the sides of sometimes unstable walls, measured columns and windows while hanging from balconies, climbed into attics and under old bridges to record the architectures he found—and separate the wheat from the chaff. Ruskin decided Gothic architecture was the architecture of Heaven, and Renaissance work was—not. A feature of the book which delights the reader willing to float with Ruskin down the canals of Venice (not speed-read through for a thesis) is the author’s digressions on the Meaning of It All. Venice, the brightest of cities, celebrated it glory with the brightest of architecture and art—the Byzantine and Gothic—recognizing (as quoth Browning, dear Melissa) that God is in His Heaven. When double-dealing and impiety came to rule Venice in the counting-houses on the Rialto and the Palace of the Doge, it found the old pieties—civil and religious—too constraining and abandoned them for the re-born pagan paintings and buildings of the Renaissance. The art and architecture a people produce, Ruskin provocatively insists, reveals its soul. The Venice of the Renaissance, he dogmatically states, misplaced its soul and it shows. I had great fun reading this and yesterday decided I’m going to read it again this week, just for fun and see what more I can glean. I wonder, were Ruskin to come to Los Angeles and putter through our buildings and artstuffs, what he would deduce about our souls?
QUOTES OF THE PRINCIPALS:
“I prefer rogues to imbeciles, because they sometimes take a rest.”—Alexandre Dumas
“It is rare that one can see in a little boy the promise of a man, but one can almost always see in a little girl the threat of a woman.”—Alexandre Dumas (I just quote ‘em, I don’t write ‘em!—GW)
“There are two kinds of stones, one of which rolls.”—Amelia Earhart
“I'm glad I'm not Brezhnev. Being the Russian leader in the Kremlin. You never know if someone's tape recording what you say.”—President Richard M Nixon
“Politics would be a helluva good business if it weren't for the goddamned people.”—President Richard M Nixon
“When you are skinning your people, you should leave some skin on to heal, so that you can skin them again.”—Premier Nikita Khrushchev
Friday, July 17, 2009
Companions on the Journey
A CLOSE FRIEND of mine is dying. I am going to see him tomorrow, not for the last time, I hope, but to bid him Godspeed. Bob has been a rare companion on my walk through the labyrinth. A true friend, in my book of definitions, is one who loves you enough to tell you the truth, but privately. That Bob has done and I hope, so too, have I. My journey along the labyrinth has been a particularly rich one. I have known souls of great depth and incredible shallowness, men of wealth and homeless vagabonds, liars and poets, saints and scoundrels. All of them, one way or another, have enriched my journey (admittedly, my appreciation for some of them has grown only as my association with them has faded). But as I pause to jot down my weekly thoughts on the labyrinth, I can’t help but to remember those I’ve known and loved—or at least—known. One of the greatest gifts God gives us is those with whom we share our lives. Like ‘em or not, they are walking a labyrinth no less difficult, if obviously different, than our own. Sometimes, it takes a death to remind us how great are the gifts of life. Each of us must walk our path by ourselves, but God knows it’s not good for us to be alone.
This week—today, in fact—the Episcopal Church in the United States concludes its General Convention, which meets every three years. Given the choices Episcopalians have made at these get-togethers over the past few decades, it’s probably just as well they don’t meet more often. This time, they made a couple of decisions that surprised nobody who is in the least familiar with that religious body—they decided to remove any bars to the ordination of practicing homosexuals (that phrase always strikes me as funny—are they homosexuals who will keep trying till they get it right? if so, shouldn’t we at least occasionally use the phrase “accomplished homosexuals?”) and to authorize the insertion of rites for homosexual marriages into the next edition of the Book of Common Prayer. No surprises there. Much more interesting was the opening sermon of the Convention, preached by Katharine Jefferts Schori, the Presiding Bishop of the Episcopals. She declared it was heretical to believe in “individual” salvation. The bishopess called this “the great Western heresy: that we can be saved as individuals, that any of us alone can be in right relationship with God." Christians of every denomination from the Catholic Church to television evangelists have decried her remarks. Every error, though, is palatable because it contains a kernel of truth, regardless of what the kernel may be buried in. The truth is, we find salvation, to a very great degree, because of the others with us on our pilgrimage. Whatever our faith, or lack of it, we learned its essentials because of those around us. Our families and friends and teachers and pastors have helped each of us become what we are. So Ms Schori is right to this degree: none of us can be saved without the help of those around us. But she is wrong in this equally profound degree: God has made us as individuals, each bearing His image. How I walk along the labyrinth either mars or polishes the greatest gift God has given me: His image of Himself in me. And to the degree I deface the image, nobody around me has to wonder about the reality of hell: I carry hell wherever I go. And most happily, the opposite is also true. To the degree I burnish that image and make it shine, I make it possible for those around me to know, without an intellectual discourse, that Heaven, too is a reality. My friend Bob walked his labyrinth nobly and gracefully, and is now taking his last steps. To the eye which sees but does not understand, he can barely walk. But I know he is sprinting to the center of his labyrinth, knowing Who waits for him there.
FROM MY BOOKSTACK this week, I confess to picking up a book out of sheer indulgence. I first read this book, Journey into Fear, back in 1970. I don’t know how many times—ten at least—I’ve read it since. The copy I now own is my third. Eric Ambler, the author, worked writing copy for a London advertising agency before World War II, writing short stories and a few novels on the side. Journey into Fear was the last, and best, he wrote before the war (many, me included, would simply say this was his best). It is pure escapism, a spy novel whose main character is not a spy, and is wonderfully peopled with Turkish spies and Italian sailors, a elderly German archaeologist and a pair of seedy flamenco dancers. Howard Graham, the protagonist, is an English engineer sent to Istanbul as a temporary consultant. The night before he is to return home, he enters his still-dark hotel room and is shot. He doesn’t know why and neither do we readers for some time. His dangerous escape from would-be assassins puts him aboard slow-moving tramp steamers and fast moving French trains each replete with hidden dangers. Ambler’s writing is tight and fast-paced, but the characters are well-drawn and fascinating, and it is the characters, wittingly and unwittingly, who drive the plot. I’ve read—and own—all eighteen of Ambler’s novels and a collection of his short stories called Waiting for Orders, and occasionally find myself drawn back to the bookshelf where they stand, lined at attention and ready for use. But this is the one I pick up most often when I go there. If you see it somewhere, pick it up, but I offer the invitation with this caveat—don’t plan to read anything else for the next day or two, because you will be otherwise occupied.
QUOTES OF THIS WEEK’S PRINCIPALS:
“I feel much better now that I am certain the pope is the Antichrist.”—Martin Luther
“All dressed up, with nowhere to go.”—Bishop William White
“I am not yet ready to be Tsar. I know nothing of the business of ruling.”—Tsar Nicholas II, on the day of his coronation.
“It is true that liberty is precious; so precious that it must be carefully rationed.”—Vladimir I Lenin, who ordered the Romanov’s slaughter
“We will not do less research and development work, and I will not discharge any of the people we have hired; I will work for nothing if I have to."—Dr Willis Carrier, when told by his bankers at the coming of the Depression he needed to fire workers tp keep up profits
“I only hope that we don't lose sight of one thing – all this was started by a mouse.”—Walt Disney as he opened Disneyland
Friday, July 10, 2009
Mapping the Path
ROBERT LOUIS STEVENSON once wrote, “Every boy loves maps.” It’s certainly true in my case, but Stevenson would undoubtedly be accused of sexism if he penned those words today. Perhaps justly. A lot of us, male and female, love maps and the hidden promises they enfold. There was an old map shop I used to frequent in New Orleans, closed by the hurricane, which was one big open room laden with maps: maps on counters, maps in big, wide drawers, maps on the wall, maps in cases, no inch of the place—except the floor—but was covered with a map. There were gigantic maps on the ceiling and I got more than one crick in my neck looking up when in that store. My great prize from there was a reproduction of a map of the plantations of Louisiana along the Mississippi, originally done about 1855. It’s 7 feet tall and 32 inches wide, and gives the names and owners of each plantation from Belle Chasse to La Barre. There are maps like this I cherish, but I’ll confess something here. I can’t bring myself to throw maps away. Outdated road maps, tattered maps, AAA maps I’ve got three duplicates of, I always stop and think “What if somebody needs this someday?” I know what Stevenson was talking about. I doubt he could bring himself to toss out a map either.
Labyrinths are ancient, much older than Christianity. The first labyrinth to be dated was built 1,000 years before Moses led the children of Israel out of Egypt. They’ve always been seen as sacred pathways, but with the coming of Christianity, they disappeared from the Mediterranean world. No doubt, they were seen as holdovers from the Old Ways. Then, about 1200 or so, give or take a century, labyrinths began to re-appear. On the floors of large parish churches and the pavements of the new Gothic cathedrals, these ancient patterns found a new meaning. They were seen and used as paths of pilgrimage. After the Muslims closed off Christian holy places to pilgrims and the wars we now call the Crusades were being waged, people began walking (often on their knees) these labyrinths as a way of making a pilgrimage. Often the central core, the heart of the labyrinth, was inscribed “Jerusalem” or had a picture of the holy city painted there. The labyrinth, with all its twists and turns, is both a journey and a map.
About half-a-dozen of those medieval labyrinths still survive in European cathedrals. Some new ones have been built. But even those of us who can’t walk the labyrinths 0f Chartres or Amiens can still benefit from them. Their very existence can teach us about our own lives and pilgrimages. Most obviously, they teach us we need maps. We need a guide to help us get to where we want to go. How much gasoline, do you think, have GPS systems saved? How many arguments have been averted when men, on whose stubborn ears the phrase “why don’t you stop and ask someone where we are?” once fell as on barren ground, now simply punch the family’s destination into the car’s GPS device? In the labyrinth of our lives each of us needs guidance, help along the way. We each have to walk the path God has set us on, but we can walk well or poorly, we can succeed or fail. Even though the path you're walking is yours alone, others have been walking paths like yours for countless years, stumbling where you've stumbled, dancing where you've danced, crying tears like yours, delighting in the same silvered moons you've wondered at. You've got to walk your labyrinth yourself, but you don't have to walk it alone. There are great men and women who've gone before you. Read, mark, learn and inwardly digest their stories of spiritual struggle and failure and growth. Find a friend to talk to about the deep things of your life, the things that make you who you are. The early Christians in Ireland and Wales called someone like this a "soul friend." Not necessarily a spiritual director, but a companion along the way. Your spiritual life isn't merely your "church life" or the stuff you do people might call "religious." It's who you are when you're measured at your deepest point; the part of yourself you meet the most rarely, the you you know the least.It's the you God put in the labyrinth and said "Get on with it. Start walking." So what map will you use as you travel? That depends on where you decide you want to walk. From one pilgrim to another I simply say: choose that map wisely.
FROM MY BOOKSTACK this week, a pleasant surprise, Journey Back to Eden, by Mark Gruber, OSB. Fr Gruber is a Benedictine monk who spent a year in Egypt living among the Copts. He went to do a sociological study of them to complete his field work for his doctorate in anthropology. My good friend, Col. P J Hickey (ret), sent it to me as an Easter gift. I just read it this week, which shows you behind I am in my reading. But I’m glad I kept it on the bookstack. Fr Gruber went to Egypt "to study this ancient and indigenous people." The book tells the story of how he came to analyze their culture and ended up embracing their ways. Fr Gruber didn’t abandon his American Catholicism and become a pseudo-Egyptian; he did something much more profound. He eventually came to see himself, and his faith, through their eyes. Through the rich experiences he recounts in the book, he discovered the common, core faith he shared with his hosts. He lived in the desert monasteries of Egypt for a year and came to understand the fiery discipline of the ancient monks was not a throwback to times past, but a true way forward for people of faith. He contrasts the life of Christians in Egypt, where the Copts are a persecuted minority, to the life of Christians here in America, where even the monastic life is rich and fat by comparison. Here, we have evangelists who preach the good news that God wants us to be wealthy; there, the Coptic monks tell the people their persecuted status is God’s plan for the redemption of Egypt, Coptic and Muslim. This is the moving story of a man who went to Egypt to study anthropology and discovered his life as a Christian. I wasn’t expecting much from this book but in reading it made some happy discoveries of my own. Journey Back to Eden was published by Orbis Books in 2002.
Quotes from today’s principals:
“I consider looseness with words no less of a defect than looseness of the bowels.”—John Calvin (this is as funny as Calvin gets)
“Scare. Terrify. Petrify your opponent."—Paul Morphy
"I have never killed a man, but I have read many obituaries with great pleasure."--Clarence Darrow, Attorney for John Scopes
Friday, July 03, 2009
Schizophrenia--Spiritual and Otherwise
UNLESS YOU LIVE in a cave in Egypt (not an entirely unattractive thought), you know Michael Jackson died this past week. Several major stores in Los Angeles greeted shoppers over the past few days with large signs: “No Michael Jackson Items Left.” He has been eulogized by our new President and is undergoing a secular canonization in the press. His music doesn’t appeal to me, so I am not a fit judge of his talents, but if the number of his enthusiasts is a good indication, he was a man of much talent. I do know, regardless of the truths or untruths surrounding his personal life, he was plagued by many demons, inside and out, physical and mental and most certainly demons spiritual. Like so many who play leading roles in our society, he had both a public persona and a private character, and the divorce of the two led to a type of schizophrenia, a torn and damaged personality. A look at the news coverage over the past week shows the fascination our society has with both sides of Michael Jackson. But he is far from exceptional. A respected “family-values” governor crumbles right in front of television cameras as he reveals his love-sickness. A few months ago Bill Clinton was paid $500,000 for a speech he made to a group of bankers in Dubai, but one of them told reporters afterwards, “All we wanted to do was meet the man who soiled Monica Lewinsky’s dress.” We can’t seem to get enough of it. Is it too much of a leap from there to say that with these sort of leaders, our society is increasingly schizophrenic? The bulwarks of our society—political, educational, religious, financial, medical—are failing to hold up under pressure. There is much talent, much flash, much glamor, but little inner strength. More and more, we are becoming less and less.
Tomorrow, we celebrate the Fourth of July. What are we celebrating? Surely it’s more than a national remembering that the Declaration was signed in Philadelphia 233 years ago. We must be saying those events mean something today. Not just because our taxes are lower today than they were under King George, not because our liberties are now greater, the restrictions on us less, the government not as intrusive…well…um…on paper we have a right to the government we want, so look the situation at Los Angeles City Hall, the State House in Sacramento and the columned halls of Washington DC and ponder the “more perfect Union” we’ve formed. But before we vent our righteous indignation at those damned politicians, bear in mind the men and women in public office rarely do anything on their own. They are more followers than leaders, looking to polls rather than principles before making up their minds. That shouldn’t be surprising. The Founders of our country knew they would, and designed a government accordingly. Ours is not a direct democracy, where every vote ultimately matters. We have a representative democracy, a republic, where we choose people to do the governing for us. The Founders left us a government that would, by and large, reflect what we believe and do what we want. This is all by way of saying, the government we have embodies the society we’ve built. As society changes, so too does government. Every elected government official says what his constituents want to hear. Can you imagine Theodore Roosevelt, 100 years ago, or John F Kennedy, 50 years ago, supporting the infanticide, the broad sweep of abortions throughout America today? Democrats and Republicans alike support this horror, because they believe their constituents do. Euthanasia doesn’t have much support in Congress, because there’s little support or demand for killing off gramps right now. Wait another 25 years, when we’ve got an increasing number of octogenarians draining government revenues and see what the polls say then. We don’t have a government of principle but policy. Our public policies are schizophrenic because our society is schizophrenic.
But don’t write us off yet. Two thousand years ago, Cicero cried, “O tempora! O mores!” “Oh, the times! Oh, the manners!” feeling things couldn’t get much worse. Policies can change and so can societies. For them to change, we, the people, have to change. Our world can only grow in grace and wisdom, if we grow in grace and wisdom. Groaning and griping about bad politicians and pathetic leaders and stupid policies doesn’t take anybody off the road to ruin. It just makes the journey the more unpleasant for everybody. To walk a labyrinth is to walk a road of grace. We walk with the assurance that the journey will end happily, no matter our difficulties and failures along the way. One thing though, a word to the wise walker: don’t gripe and grumble down the path, bemoaning the state of things with grumbly—eloquent, but grumbly—Cicero. The time will come, when you will be called on to fight the good fight. When it comes, do your best. Fight to the finish. But don’t let the “iron enter into your soul,” as the Psalmist said. Don’t be twisted by the times or discouraged by the battle. When you and I come to the Center of our labyrinths, our walk will end. We’ll then be Otherwise Occupied. If I was to guess (and I’m a pretty good guesser), I would guess the true peace and genuine freedom we have waiting for us Elsewhere, will be in proportion to the peace and freedom we have found—and made, for ourselves and others—walking through the life we are living right now.
FROM MY BOOKSTACK this week, a couple of fun things I wanted to share. First, not a book at all, but a printed menu! Fr Robert Sanchez, my old Romish friend, made a gift to me last Sunday of an antique menu from the Hollywood Brown Derby. It's not dated, but has “Thursday” printed at the bottom right corner. So, naturally, the first thing I did was to look at the dishes and how much they cost. Under “Brown Derby De Luxe Dinners” the Whole Broiled Live Lobster, with Drawn Butter, the Soup du Jour (Chicken Broth with Egg Noodles) and Derby Salad with French Dressing, Assorted Vegetables and Choice of Potatoes cost the Thursday diner $3.00. The front of the menu is decorated with caricatures of well-known Hollywood patrons of the establishment. I mentioned the menu to Dolores Davis, a friend who keeps tabs on me for our Writing Group, and a chef of renown. She loaned me an aging book titled The Brown Derby Cookbook, my most fun book this week. It was written by Leonard Lewis Levinson in 1949. While most of a cookbook is wasted on the likes of me, I did write down about six or seven recipes I want to remember, including Avocado Neptune Derby, Mexican Barbecued Lamb and one listing titled simply Brown Gravy (underneath the title, Dolores long ago penciled in “Very Good!”). Aside from the recipes, though, the book has a wonderful essay, “The Story of the Brown Derbies” giving an account, historical, mythological and culinary, of the eateries. The book also includes a “Glossary and Table” to help understand the Derby’s unique recipes, and a concluding section titled “How to Read a Menu.” The last of the Derbies (Los Feliz) closed when I was pastor of St Mary’s, right down the street. I used to treat ecclesiastical visitors to a meal there while it was still open. I wish I’d known about this book back in those halcyon days.
Quotes from the Principals:
“He who does not know how to lie, does not know how to reign.” King Louis XI
“For every Southern boy fourteen years old, not once but whenever he wants it, there is the instant when it's still not yet two o'clock on that July afternoon in 1863, the brigades are in position behind the rail fence, the guns are laid and ready in the woods and the furled flags are already loosened… Pickett himself with his long oiled ringlets and his hat in one hand and his sword in the other waits, looking up the hill waiting for Longstreet to give the word and it's all in the balance, it hasn't happened yet…”— William Faulkner on Pickett’s Charge, Intruder in the Dust
“Many a bum show has been saved by the flag.”—George M Cohan
Okay—one recipe:
Fresh Shrimp Saute Brown Derby Serves 3
4 oz butter; 1 lb raw shrimp, peeled, split and cleaned; 1/2 lb mushrooms,sliced; 1 bead garlic, chopped fine; 2 tbs finely chopped green onion; 1/2 tsp basil;
1/2 cup white wine; 1/2 cup Brown Gravy or chicken broth; 1 tsp celery salt; 1 tsp Worcestershire Sauce; 2 cups steamed rice
Heat butter in heavy skillet. Add shrimp and sauté on medium heat for 8 minutes. Add mushrooms, garlic, green onion and basil. Saute 2 minutes more. Add wine and reduce by two-thirds. Add brown gravy, celery salt and Worcestershire Sauce. Serve over steamed rice.
Gracias, Dolores!
Friday, June 26, 2009
Two Roads
IT’S EASY TO BE outraged. In fact, sometimes it’s hard not to be. I did my weekly fulminating when I read the words of a womanpriest in a national Episcopalian magazine assuring her readers that God was pleased whenever a woman exercised her right to abort her child. If my teeth were better, I would have gnashed them. Instead, I wrote a sharp satirical piece proposing liturgical rites for the blessing of abortion clinics and “Prayers for an Easy Termination,” but my little production will remain (pardon me) “unbirthed.” Outrage and anger are easy, and the road they lead down is broad and wide; once we get accustomed to that walk, our steps aren’t easily retraced. You’ve known people who are on it. Complaints are their daily fare; whining is one of the few things they’ll share with others. Whenever anything good is said about someone, they quickly remind us everyone’s motives are mixed. Good news evokes the cynical response “how long do you think that will last?” Anger seethes and bubbles in some of us like witch’s brew in a cauldron, and it’s poison to the human soul. Those Seven Deadly Sins (and Anger is one of the leaders of the list incidentally; poor old Lust is just a straggler) are deadly not because they make God mad at us, but because they shrivel us up. They transform our souls into petrified prunes, and when they’re finished with us, even we don’t like ourselves.
That’s not the path God wants us on. That road is narrow, strewn with obstacles, a labyrinth the end of which is not clearly visible. But God put us on it so we could bring ourselves to walk upright like men and women, not slither like slugs or wander like moles. Aristotle said the proper “end” of man is happiness (he meant “woman” too, but in those days everybody didn’t have to be explicitly told their gender, ethnic group, and ‘faith community’ was included for them to be able to understand that). By happy he didn’t mean “winning the lottery” happy or happy as in “He was happy when he learned his ex-wife was being audited.” The Philosopher understood that genuine happiness isn’t the result of something that happens to us. “The Kingdom of God is within you.” There’s a wonderful old Spanish phrase, from the days of medieval pilgrimage, which is apt for a modern-day pilgrim on today’s labyrinthine path: “If God isn’t with you on the first step of your journey, you won’t find him by walking all the way to Jerusalem.” Happiness comes from doing your job, whatever it is, well; from doing something good for someone else when you know they’ll never find out about it; from looking for beauty—if you seek, you will always find it. The world God has given us is stuft’d full of beauty, and He’s given us the eyes to see it and the ears to hear it. It’s not that it’s not all around us; it’s that we make ourselves blind and deaf to it, with self-centeredness and anger and jealousy and—but you know the rest of the list of Seven.
So don’t rush through the steps of your labyrinth. Enjoy the journey, savor the pace. The scenery along the way is there just for you.
FROM MY BOOKSTACK this week, comes a mirthful little volume titled Misreadings by Umberto Eco, author of the very long novel, The Name of the Rose. Misreadings is a collection of fifteen small pieces of fun. Eco was hired, in 1959, to write a monthly column for Il Verro, an Italian literary magazine. He began submitting parodies of the ponderous contents of the magazine to the magazine itself. It says something of the editors that they published them all. One is a set of internal critiques, supposedly from a publishing company, on why they’re rejecting certain books as unsuitable, including the Bible (“I must say the first few hundred pages of this manuscript really hooked me…sex (lots of it), murders, massacres and so on…but as I kept reading, I realized this is actually an anthology, involving several writers…I’d suggest getting the rights to just the first few chapters, but using a different title. How about Red Sea Desperadoes?”), Homer’s Odyssey (“…remember in his first book, how the Achilles-Patroclus story, with its not-so-latent homosexuality got us into trouble?”), and a dozen or so others, including refusal letters to Cervantes and Dante. Another piece is an account of Columbus discovering America, accompanied by modern-day news media and their attendant host of experts, in this case including Leonardo da Vinci, who gets short-shrift from the reporters when he becomes too technical.
Any of the selections can be read in ten or fifteen minutes. The satire is rich, at times thick, written to mock scholarship which labors on the ephemeral and a society which concerns itself with the trivial. But I read it with such pleasure partly because the satire and mockery isn’t bitter or angry or malicious. Eco’s Misreadings holds up a mirror and lets us see ourselves; he helps us see how silly we can sometimes be when we make more of things than they are. I’m going to put this book on the bookshelf in my bedroom, so I can pick it up frequently for a refreshing sip.
Quotes from the Principals:
Julian the Apostate—“So long as you are a slave to the opinions of the many you have not yet approached freedom.”
Pearl S Buck—“The truth is always exciting. Speak it, then. Life is dull without it.” And one more from her, because it seems so wonderfully apt. Remember, her parents were missionaries to China. “We send missionaries to China so the Chinese can get to heaven, but we won't let them into our country.”
John F Kennedy, in Berlin—“All free men, wherever they may live, are citizens of Berlin. And therefore, as a free man, I take pride in the words ‘Ich bin ein Berliner!’ ”
Peter Lorre—“Don’t you think we should drive a stake through his heart, just in case?” (to Vincent Price at Bela Lugosi's funeral)
Saturday, June 20, 2009
SOMETIMES EVEN WATCHING television can be fun. I don’t recommend it in regular doses, but a fortuitous blend of the right (or maybe, the wrong) people can unexpectedly produce odd and funny moments. One such I recall was a “debate” between Christopher Hitchins, a disheveled but erudite proponent for atheism, and the Reverend Al Sharpton, most well-known for blustering wherever a television camera is turned on. Sharpton posed the not-fully-thought out proposition that without religion there is no basis for morality. For the next nine minutes the reverend was deftly eviscerated by Hitchins, but fortunately, Al didn’t seem to realize it. On Chris Matthews’ program (miscalled “Hardball”) the other night came another fun wundermoment: Matthews fatuously observed to Pat Buchanan, “…you Pat Buchanan, although you are a libertarian in many ways, you do not--no, you're a nationalist actually--you are not what you like to call, derisively, a democratist.” Buchanan responded, “No, I don't believe there's a great salvation in a political process at all. I believe in different--in far different things. I put democracy far down the line in the--I think a devoutly Christian, conservative traditionalist country, even if it's a monarchy, is fine…” The fun part though, was less the words than the picture. When Buchanan espoused this political heresy, both Matthews and the other guest sat open-mouthed. After a couple of seconds of crackling, empty airtime, Matthews croaked “Your Franco is talking, Pat. Franco is speaking even now.”
Fun as it was to watch, at the heart of this exchange is something worth pondering. One of the sacred cornerstones in the world we’re now a-building we call “democracy,” and it’s seen as an end in itself. Buchanan was saying the cornerstone isn’t sacred; there are things more important than how the world is governed. That is undoubted heresy to American politicians, who see—and want us to see—their careers as Very Important to the Public. Buchanan was not saying our form of government is unimportant or irrelevant, but that some things in life are more important. Faith and family, art and joy, a close friend and a field of bluebonnets, these things are sacred; they make life worth the living. Government is a device, a tool: in some hands good, in some bad. Hitler was democratically elected. So, too, was Hamas. In a speech made to the House of Commons in 1947, Churchill famously said “Democracy is the worst form of government, except for all those other forms that have been tried from time to time." His hidden caveat is worth remembering. Churchill wasn’t slyly winking at us and cleverly saying “democracy really is best, you know.” He was telling us that it’s flawed. The core of his words is theological. It was an acknowledgment that, try as we might, we cannot build the New Jerusalem out of social programs and government grants. We have a problem, and, as Pogo said, it “is us.”
Some of our Founders (not all of them), understood that America is an experiment, one which could fail. Towards the end of his life, Jefferson lamented “The natural progress of things is for liberty to yield and government to gain ground.” About the same time, his friend, John Adams, wrote to a correspondent, “Remember democracy never lasts long. It soon wastes, exhausts, and murders itself. There never was a democracy yet that did not commit suicide.” Shortly after the close of the Constitutional Convention in 1789, Benjamin Franklin said in a letter to a French well-wisher: “Our new Constitution is now established, and has an appearance that promises permanency; but in this world nothing can be said to be certain, except death and taxes.” We all know the last part of this quote, but its value is to warn us that few things, governments among them, last. Monarchies, republics, theocracies, dictatorships, democracies, none endure. Artists, thinkers, writers, musicians, poets and priests have lived and worked in places of freedom and times of oppression. Buchanan was reminding us that the basic things that make life worth living are not the gifts of government but the gifts of God. Some people, it seems, just don’t know the difference.
We are all of us walking God's labyrinth, even if many of us insist it's of our own building.
FROM MY BOOKSTACK this week, I read Tennessee Williams’ last major play, “A House Not Meant to Stand.” Williams called it “a Gothic Comedy,” and it is, in parts, hilariously funny. It’s a play and to really appreciate it as the author intended, it’s best seen and heard, not read. Still, Williams’ ability to draw fascinating and eccentric characters, while at the same time keeping them accessible (by calling to mind bits of people we have known) comes across even on the page. Though in two acts, the movement is continuous and act two picks up just where act one drops off. The action takes place during a single night, set in the leaky, old Pascagoula home of Cornelius McCorkle and his wife Bella. For the duration of the play, a particularly long and noisy thunderstorm rages outside. The old couple returns home after a trip to Memphis for their eldest son’s funeral. Cornelius is a big-mouthed bully and a failed politician and Bella is a fat old woman who fades in and out of what we used to call ‘senility.’ Doesn’t sound like the ingredients for comedy, but Williams does it, though not without some preachiness (the most dated part of the play) along the way. The naked girl at the top of the stairs helps you pay attention, too. My copy, published in 2008 by New Directions, has an excellent introduction, titled “A Mississippi Funhouse,” by Thomas Keith.
Quotes from Today’s Principals:
“We fight, get beat, rise, and fight again."—Nathaniel Greene
“…this filthy novelty…is a custom loathsome to the eye, hateful to the nose, harmful to the brain, dangerous to the lungs, and in the black stinking fume thereof nearest resembling the horrible stygian smoke of the Pit that is Bottomless.”—King James (yes, of Bible fame), “A Counterblaste to Tobacco”
“Doubt, it seems to me, is the central condition of a human being in the twentieth century.”—Salman Rushdie
“Always go to the bathroom when you have a chance.” King George V
WALKING, JOURNEYING, MAKING a pilgrimage, these and similar words have for a long time given us one of the best analogies of what life is. I, obviously, can think of few better descriptions of one’s pathway through life than walking a labyrinth. A journey, and certainly a pilgrimage, is supposed to take the traveler somewhere. This week past has been more a case of stumbling backwards than pressing on, for me personally. I received some shocking medical news (my ankle bone has completely deteriorated), took a bit of a financial hit (it cost more than $1000 for a car repair), and almost three thousand words of my novel disappeared overnight because of a computer problem (that taught me to back it up every night). At week’s end I consider it all in the context of the labyrinth. Not every step moves us forward, and it’s best to know it. We stumble and fall, sometimes we get tripped, sometimes we collapse under the weight of things we insist on carrying. Even on the ground, though, we’re in the labyrinth. God won’t let us out of it. He’s not playing with us, at least not maliciously (another time-worn analogy of life sees it as a game). “We see through a glass, darkly.” I’ve come to the realization that God is not too interested in whether or not we understand what goes on in our lives, or why things happen to us, as He is in growing us up. “To whom much is given, of him much is required.” St James reminds us we won’t be tempted (“tested” is just as good in Greek) above our abilities to deal with the test.
So what to do? How do we deal with the fact that sometimes we’re not even taking baby steps forward but giant steps back? While the answers are myriad, a few seem best: and the best of the best is gratitude. We are surrounded by wonder, from the far-flung stars to the sea shore’s sand; the shades of green in a tree, the sun’s warmth, an arpeggio by Bach or a friend’s familiar voice. I recall somewhere reading that the great tragedy of the atheist is not damnation, but that there is no One to thank when he needs to be thankful. In spite of the frequently-predicted doom about to be immanently wrought by global warming or nuclear terrorists, our cultures have produced amazing and wonderful things. Go to a library and look at the rows and rows of books. Watch an airplane take off. Watch even a bad movie and think about what it took to produce this piece of trash—better, watch a masterpiece. We live in a world that God has created and we have made. Not perfect (remember we’re looking at this from the labyrinth floor), but still grand and good, and—for some reason—it has pleased God to put us here in the midst of it. We may never know why; if I ever get out of Purgatory, I may not even remember to ask why about the past given What Is About To Follow. Maybe it’s enough to bear in mind, as we slowly pick ourselves up from the ant’s-eye view of the labyrinth, that we are not here for ourselves alone, but for the others walking the labyrinth with us.
A GREAT BOOK I found this week: The Majesty of the French Quarter by Kerri McCaffety, published by Pelican Publishing in 2000. It’s pages are resplendent with the colors of the Vieux Carre, and leafing through its big pages is like an evening walk through the old city. One of the most fun things about the Quarter (if you’re not one of the hoi polloi of Bourbon Street) is the amazing contrast between the sometimes demur view an old house presents to the street, and the lush, water-spangled courtyards hiding behind the old walls. This book shows you the house from the street, then invites you inside for a tour of the rooms, and finally into the old Creole patios, the heart of each home. A book to look through over and over and over again!
“We are what we repeatedly do; excellence, then, is not an act but a habit.”—Aristotle
Thursday, June 04, 2009
Habits—Spiritual and Otherwise
Walking the Labyrinth, June 4, 2009—Today is the feast day of St Charles Lwanga and Companions, martyred in Uganda in 1886; the birthday of Jefferson Davis, first (last, and only) President of the Confederate States of America, born in 1808; in 1989, two events of note: the Communist Chinese government began its termination of the student protests around Tienanmen Square, and Iran's spiritual leader, Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini, died. Pope John XXIII died on the same date, 26 years earlier.
Our spiritual lives, like all the other aspects of our lives, are influenced by what happens to us. We are impacted by things great and small, many of them beyond our control. But the principal influence on our spiritual lives comes from inside us, from our habits and chosen dispositions. Habits, at some level, are choices. When we think of habits we might think of the man who “habitually” shakes a leg when he’s nervous, or the girl who repeatedly plays with strands of hair while she talks on the phone. But habits—good and bad—run deep in us, and can have profound influences on how we live and whether or not we are happy. Prayer can become a habit. How we deal with life’s frustrations is grounded in the disposition of our souls, and that disposition can be formed by habit. Habits of soul can give us stability in a world of uncertainty. The Church’s worship, her liturgy, is habitual. Traditions of worship, Protestant or Catholic, Jewish or Muslim, Hindu or Buddhist, provide stability to religious beliefs and outlooks. This past Sunday, some friends took me to an Eastern Rite Russian church for Pentecost. I haven’t been to a Russian liturgy for years, but you may know that I spent a year living in a Russian Orthodox monastery in New York while attending an affiliated seminary. Over that year I learned some of the basics of Russian and Old Church Slavonic (an early form of Russian which over the centuries has become the liturgical language of the Russian Church) and learned some of the basic chants of the Russian tradition. When we went into St Andrew’s Church on Sunday, I was taken back. The church is not beautiful to the eye: it has 19th century style iconography (bad imitations of Italianate Renaissance figures) throughout the church, old 1960’s style wood paneling, and it’s cluttered with stuff. But when the choir began their chants (they were surprisingly good) and I heard the clack of the censer as the deacon made his very thorough rounds of the church, swinging the censer at each and every icon and person in the building, the years and miles evaporated. I was surprised how much of the old chants I remembered; though Fr Sanchez, one of our group, put a liturgy-book in my hands, I didn’t need it and never opened it. I sang at times, at times I listened silently, and most often my eyes were drwn back, over and over, to an old Russian All Saints Day icon, three joined panels depicting the Blessed Virgin surrounded by row after row of saints, all of their hands upturned in worship. The joy or worship—the freedom to step completely out of yourself and focus on He Who Is—came to me afresh. It came from habit, a habit of a lifetime of worship, most of the time imperfect, but perhaps perfect worship here on earth can only be experienced vicariously, looking at an All Saints icon, knowing that the Day is Yet to Come when we will be “regular and frequent” (to borrow an old Prayer Book phrase) in perfect worship. Our personal habits build our spiritual lives. That’s what a daily walking of the Labyrinth means.